Science SchoolAdministration

E-TRADE TOGETHER GLOBAL ACADEMY

Advanced Simulation

Course 9.3 · Level 9 · Modeling & Simulation Prerequisites: Course 9.2 · Connects to: Autonomous Technology Workshop

Course material under academic review

6 canonical classes · 3 laboratories · 3 modules

Administrator review mode

No payment, enrollment or prerequisite restriction. Review content is available only to authorized administrators.

UI/UX authority: current Mathematical Foundations implementation. Rendered-content verification requires format parity.

Module 1 information

Integrated models & parameter estimation

Two classes; complete practice and assessment before advancing.

9.3.1 · v1 · 75 minutes

Multi-domain simulation

Why it matters

Coupled subsystems can produce plausible yet incorrect outputs when their interfaces disagree.

Learning objectives

  • Compute first thermal step for ηP=80 W, C=400 J/°C, Δt=10 s at T=Ta.
  • For T=22 °C and h=2 W/°C, Ta=20 °C, compute loss and next thermal step.
  • Verify the calculation and define independent validation evidence.

Prerequisites

Course 9.2

Concept, definitions and key terms

A coupled simulation exchanges state across domains at a declared interface. For a thermal-electrical system, electrical power P produces heat Q̇=ηP; temperature changes with C dT/dt=ηP−h(T−Ta). Define P in W, C in J/°C, h in W/°C, T in °C, time in s. One-way coupling fixes P; feedback lets resistance or a controller change P as T changes. Identify boundary, sign convention, exchange variables, different time scales and interface assumptions before selecting a numerical step. Model equations are not the physical system.

Notation, state, units and assumptions

Thermal state Tₖ₊₁=Tₖ+Δt[ηP−h(Tₖ−Ta)]/C. Interface heat ηP in W=J/s. Controller state u∈{0,1}; optional P=uPmax. Check that Δt·W/(J/°C) is °C.

Simulation method and procedure

Electrical/thermal device: T₀=20 °C, Ta=20 °C, η=.8, P=100 W, C=400 J/°C, h=2 W/°C, Δt=10 s. Q̇=80 W and loss initially 0 W; Euler yields T₁=22 °C. Next loss=4 W and T₂=23.9 °C. Verify energy: 10·80/400=2 °C and 10·76/400=1.9 °C. Validate against an independent temperature sensor; constant η and h are assumptions.

Define model and units → calculate a baseline → vary or estimate inputs → record results → verify arithmetic → validate against untouched evidence → state limits.

Worked simulation examples

Worked example 1

System, variables, parameters, units, assumptions and calculation: Electrical/thermal device: T₀=20 °C, Ta=20 °C, η=.8, P=100 W, C=400 J/°C, h=2 W/°C, Δt=10 s. Q̇=80 W and loss initially 0 W; Euler yields T₁=22 °C. Next loss=4 W and T₂=23.9 °C. Verify energy: 10·80/400=2 °C and 10·76/400=1.9 °C. Validate against an independent temperature sensor; constant η and h are assumptions.

Verification and expected result: ΔT=10·80/400=2 °C; new T=22 °C.

Validation and limitations: Failure: feeding 100 kW into a component expecting W, or reversing heat-loss sign. A numerically stable trajectory can still be physically impossible. Correct interface unit conversion, energy balance and feedback timing, then compare held-out observations.

Worked example 2

System, variables, parameters, units, assumptions and calculation: Motor/control coupling: a controller turns a 50 W motor on for 2 s and off for 1 s; electrical input over 3 s is 100 J. With a 2 kg load, neglecting losses, energy would permit v=√(2·100/2)=10 m/s from rest. Real motor efficiency and controller timing reduce it. Pass on/off state and torque or power across the interface; verify joules on both sides and validate motion with independent measurements.

Verification and expected result: Loss 4 W; ΔT=10·(80−4)/400=1.9 °C; T=23.9 °C.

Validation and limitations: Failure: feeding 100 kW into a component expecting W, or reversing heat-loss sign. A numerically stable trajectory can still be physically impossible. Correct interface unit conversion, energy balance and feedback timing, then compare held-out observations.

Common simulation error / counterexample

Failure: feeding 100 kW into a component expecting W, or reversing heat-loss sign. A numerically stable trajectory can still be physically impossible. Correct interface unit conversion, energy balance and feedback timing, then compare held-out observations.

Guided practice

Compute first thermal step for ηP=80 W, C=400 J/°C, Δt=10 s at T=Ta.

Solution / evidence

ΔT=10·80/400=2 °C; new T=22 °C.

For T=22 °C and h=2 W/°C, Ta=20 °C, compute loss and next thermal step.

Solution / evidence

Loss 4 W; ΔT=10·(80−4)/400=1.9 °C; T=23.9 °C.

A/B/C/D practice

Define domain, interface variable and units for coupled thermal/electrical model.

Solution / evidence

Electrical P [W] enters thermal as ηP [W]; thermal state T [°C].

Choose a controller on/off state and thermal state; define feedback direction.

Solution / evidence

u∈{0,1} controls P; T influences threshold decision; record synchronization.

Diagnose a thermal component receiving kW but treating value as W.

Solution / evidence

Convert kW×1000 to W; test energy conservation and magnitude.

Design a motor-control coupled simulation with separate time scales and an independent validation observation.

Solution / evidence

State velocity and controller timing separately; check energy transfer and compare held-out motion trace.

Mastery checks and corrective feedback

Mastery: 4/4 checks plus a correct method, units, implementation verification and one independent validation boundary. A reviewer determines mastery.

Related laboratory and next class

Parameter estimation